# Leon Henkin

## American mathematician

Died when: 85 years 196 days (1026 months)Star Sign: Aries

Leon Albert Henkin (April 19, 1921, Brooklyn, New York - November 1, 2006, Oakland, California) was an American logician, whose works played a strong role in the development of logic, particularly in the theory of types.

He was an active scholar at the University of California, Berkeley, where he made great contributions as a researcher, teacher, as well as in administrative positions.

At this university he directed, together with Alfred Tarski, the Group in Logic and the Methodology of Science, from which many important logicians and philosophers emerged.

He had a strong sense of social commitment and was a passionate defensor of his pacifist and progressive ideas.He took part in many social projects aimed at teaching mathematics, as well as projects aimed at supporting women's and minority groups to pursue careers in mathematics and related fields.

A lover of dance and literature, he appreciated life in all its facets: art, culture, science and, above all, the warmth of human relations.

He is remembered by his students for his great kindness, as well as for his academic and teaching excellence.Henkin is mainly known for his completeness proofs of diverse formal systems, such as type theory and first-order logic (the completeness of the latter, in its weak version, had been proven by Kurt GĂ¶del in 1929).

To prove the completeness of Type Theory, Henkin introduces new semantics, based on certain structures, called general models (also known as ).

The change of semantics that he proposed permits to provide a complete for Type Theory and for Second-Order Logic, amongst other logics.

Henkin methods have aided to prove various model theory results, both in classical and non-classical logics.Besides logic, the other branch on which his investigations were centered was algebra; he specialized in cylindric algebras, in which he worked together with A.

Tarski and D.Monk.As for the philosophy of mathematics, although the works in which he explicitly approaches it are scarce, he can be considered to have a nominalist position.